Български
EnglishFifth Lawsuit and New Asset Seizure
Kiro Breyka announces that a new lawsuit for 12,500 BGN has been filed against him, which he describes as the fifth in a row. He states that he is in Popovo with a lawyer to sign a power of attorney regarding the new case. According to him, the total amounts across all cases have now reached approximately 150,000 BGN. Breyka explains that his bank accounts have once again been frozen and that he will have to provide new security in order to continue operating normally.
He notes that about a month and a half ago he deposited 59,500 BGN as security in previous proceedings and claims that despite this, some of the earlier freezes were not lifted. According to his account, a state bailiff in Lovech and bailiffs in Sofia removed certain freezes, but a private enforcement officer maintained restrictions on his accounts.
Claims of Compliance and Voluntary Payments
Breyka states that he fulfills his obligations voluntarily and does not evade responsibility. He says he deposited the requested sums immediately after they were imposed and sees no grounds for additional securities. According to him, he is a compliant taxpayer and has even prepaid approximately 16,000 BGN in taxes.
He emphasizes that he is not transferring assets, hiding funds, or attempting to escape liability. Nevertheless, he says that actions continue to be taken against him which, in his view, lack proper justification.
Allegations of Pressure and Attempted Silencing
In his statement, Breyka presents the situation as an attempt to “crush him financially and psychologically” in order to stop his public statements. He claims that the lawsuits are filed following his videos and that he was told if he continues speaking, there will be “case after case.”
According to him, the actions against him reflect a broader issue in which individuals are pressured through financial mechanisms and institutional procedures. He draws parallels with other cases where, in his view, people have been subjected to similar pressure.
Conflict with Judicial and Enforcement Institutions
Breyka directs accusations at specific individuals within the judicial and enforcement system. He states that he will file complaints with the Chamber of Private Enforcement Agents, the courts, and other institutions. He indicates readiness to pursue his rights to the fullest extent, including through international mechanisms if necessary.
He claims that legal procedures are being violated in his case because securities have been deposited but restrictions remain in place. In his view, this demonstrates unfair treatment and abuse of authority.
Political Context and Public Accusations
Breyka links his situation to political themes. He argues that he is being targeted because of his positions and his support for certain political formations. According to him, local institutional representatives act as “empowered extortionists,” applying financial pressure on individuals.
He also comments on the political environment, opinion polls, and political parties, expressing distrust toward parts of the political system and toward what he describes as the way power is exercised at the local level.
Personal Motivation and Position
Breyka states that he has no intention of remaining silent and will continue speaking publicly regardless of the pressure. He says he could resolve his personal problem by stopping his public statements but does not consider that the right course of action. He frames his actions as a defense of a broader public interest.
He stresses that he has a family, children, and grandchildren in Bulgaria and views the situation as a struggle for the future of society. According to him, the case is not merely personal but illustrates how institutional pressure can affect anyone.
Call for Support
At the end of his statement, Breyka calls on people to support him, including through subscriptions on online platforms. He explains that legal proceedings involve significant expenses and that he expects additional cases.
He says he will not give up, but financial support would make his defense easier. In his view, with sufficient public backing, he will be able to continue fighting the cases and speaking publicly.
Conclusion
Kiro Breyka describes his situation as an ongoing conflict with judicial and enforcement institutions, involving a series of lawsuits, asset freezes, and financial pressure. He maintains that he is a compliant payer yet continues to face actions that, according to him, aim to silence him. Breyka states that he will seek his rights through legal channels and will not end his public activity.
Add comment